docs(project): refresh baseline verification artifacts
Check in the PM product requirements, refreshed QA acceptance evidence, shared execution split plans, and current-phase status notes so the repo matches the current delivery baseline. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# QA Test Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Date: 2026-03-27
|
||||
Date: 2026-03-31
|
||||
Owner: QA Engineer
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Objectives
|
||||
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Owner: QA Engineer
|
||||
|
||||
## Environments
|
||||
|
||||
- Linux: current local environment available to QA.
|
||||
- Linux: current local environment available to QA, but the present session is headless and cannot capture a real Tauri window.
|
||||
- macOS: required for release acceptance, currently not provisioned in this repository.
|
||||
- Windows: required for release acceptance, currently not provisioned in this repository.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -37,10 +37,10 @@ Owner: QA Engineer
|
||||
- "Blocked" is valid only when the missing prerequisite is named.
|
||||
- "Not run" is distinct from "Pass" and must remain visible in checklists.
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Gaps On 2026-03-27
|
||||
## Current Gaps On 2026-03-31
|
||||
|
||||
- Product shell exists as a visible desktop workspace baseline with shell-level validation and empty-state handling, but not as a complete Redis feature surface.
|
||||
- No seed dataset or local Redis automation.
|
||||
- No smoke harness, installer path, or CI workflow.
|
||||
- Tauri packaging evidence is not currently present in the repository.
|
||||
- Backend automated coverage is limited to foundation-model tests in `crates/redis-core`.
|
||||
- The highest-risk gap is still missing real-window desktop evidence for connect, browse, inspect, string save, TTL update, and command execution in a GUI-capable session.
|
||||
- `pnpm run desktop:tauri:build:all` still fails in the AppImage `linuxdeploy` stage, so the full Linux bundle path is not release-ready.
|
||||
- No validated macOS or Windows build, install, launch, or smoke evidence exists.
|
||||
- Linux installer install and uninstall checks are still absent even though `.deb` and `.rpm` artifacts are reproducible.
|
||||
- Docker-backed smoke reproducibility currently depends on direct fixture scripts; there is still no `Dockerfile` or compose asset to standardize the environment handoff.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user